Yelp.com really bothers me. It’s not so much that it exists, it’s that they make no effort to give one user the ability to seem more credible the next. Their system is so easily exploitable, it ruins the purpose of the site for everyone. Does Yelp not realize this, or simply not care? Either way, here’s some free advice for the makers of Yelp:
- Have reviewers tag a review as positive or negative before posting. Do a word count, then weight the usefulness of the review. Try to write a useful negative or positive in less than 10 words. “Dude! Best/worst pizza ever, whoa!” is noise, not a useful review.
- Create a trust network. It’s kinda like a social network, but not lame. Allow users to set how many degrees of separation they trust. Sure, it’ll vastly decrease the content for certain users, but (1) they’ve chosen that so it’s OK, and (2) it’ll add a whole new facet of the site for users who just want to share/discover services with the people they know.
- Let people quietly mark posts as suspicious. Just having a general “flag this review” doesn’t do anything. It’s entirely too open, so it’s inferred use is “tell us if this is offensive to you”. On a review site, offensive is the least of your worries. Harsh language in a negative review is exactly inversely proportionate to the type of language usually found in a positive review. This is no reason to flag. C’mon, who’s steering the ship? Give your users options so they learn the different flagging reasons you’re looking for. Receiving a flag from a user who’s suspicious of a reviewer using a fake account is way more useful than wasting your time addressing an F-bomb.
- “Was this review useful/funny/cool?”. Oh, grow up! None of those things matter! Allowing users to review reviews without fixing the credibility issue is spiraling further out of control. Simply put: it’s 100% exploitable. And “funny” or “cool”? You’d get more useful data by inviting your users into your co-lo facility and encouraging them take a dump on your servers.
In the end, the whole point of the site is ruined if it allows people to exploit the most obvious weakness of all: the fake account. Not only am I suspicious of the one shining review in a collection of tarnished ones, I know for a fact that business owners post fake reviews and/or encourage other people to do it for them. So, Yelp… in the interest of your users, the fake account issue needs to be fixed ASAP – but, I’m not giving the solution to that one away for free. Sorry, but I don’t know you.
4 Comments
Hi Jeff! I was thinking/posting about recommendations and reviews today too.
I absolutely agree that users should be able to rate a review positive or negative, rather than simply a purchase being automatically considered praise for the product. Word counts are an interesting idea.
In addition to the degrees of connection/trust network, you might be interested in some of the methods I thought of for segmenting whose reviews you’re seeing. From my post:
“Your friends get reliable data on recommendations for and against from a context that
You should check out http://www.whrrl.com. They allow you to filter recommendations by trusted people and your own foodie friends.
Hello
Anal blonde first sex time
Image of people having sex
Gay man first time sex
Naked sex photo
Free porn sex movie teen
De foto gay pornografia
Porn pornographic skank skanky
First time having sex for guys
Pornosu travesti t 252 rk
Hardcore picture pornographic
First time anal sex movie
Man sex image
First oral sex time
Having image sex
Sexy photo of naked woman
First time having sex video
First time having sex story
Gay maduros pornografia
Sexual addiction pornography
Amateur forum free sex
First oral sex story time
Free pornography thumbnail
Image sex toon
First time sex story
It lyric new pornographers use
Asian image sex
First free sex story time xxx
Free first time sex movie
Hardcore pornography sex gallery
0first sex story time womens
G’night
Hello